While in Charleston a few years ago, I picked up a copy of Charleston Receipts, a reprint of an early Charleston Junior League cookbook. The folks who assembled the original did a fantastic job of collecting truly regional recipes; this is not the sort of later JL cookbook that seemed to be taken over by the soup mix/cake mix/jello powder sort of national recipes that are hard to escape after the 1970s.
When I got it home, I marked about a dozen pages with sticky notes for specific recipes to try, (there's a cookie that is the coconut version of a pecan pie bar and was delicious) and last night, thanks to some leftover rice the Cap'n made a few nights ago, I finally tried one called Philpy.
From the recipe, it was hard to tell how it was going to turn out. The rice was mashed "until fairly smooth", which was actually harder to accomplish than suspected and the final result was "vaguely smooth", I would say. The other ingredients were sort of pancake-like: whisk flour, milk and salt together until smooth, add the mashed rice, add an egg and a bit of melted butter. This thin and slightly lumpy (from the rice) batter was poured into a cake pan (the size isn't specified in the recipe) and was supposed to be baked at 450 degrees for 30 minutes. Considering there was not quite an inch of this thin batter, the recipe doesn't have any real leavener, and that's an awfully hot oven, I kept a close eye on the baking.
It started getting gigantic puffy bubbles at around five minutes, and was puffy, buttery and toasted golden brown all over at 17 minutes. The outside looked to be about a minute from scorching, so I pulled it out. The bubbles were distributed really erratically; one was about the size of my fist, and there were a few about the size of a ping-pong ball; the rest were just small blistery bits. In flavor and texture, it was most like a dutch baby (aka baked German pancake): light on the edges, denser in the middle, eggy and plain and in need of...something. Jam worked pretty well; maple syrup really didn't.
The direction said it should be split and served with butter. Well, in this version there really wasn't anything to "split"--aside from the bubbles, it was still only about an inch thick. And more butter wouldn't really fix the flavor. I got online and started googling "philpy" and an assorted combination of other words: recipe, history, charleston, rice, bread...and turned up next to nothing. This morning, I found The Carolina Rice Kitchen online, which has a section that mentions rice-based versions of johnny cakes--instead of cornmeal, rice was used. Except a johnny cake is more like a pancake, when I've had them, and they're cooked on a griddle. I didn't see anything about where the name "philpy" might have come from, if it's still a common dish (I never came across it while eating my way around the city), or what it's origins might be.
It seems likely to be a way of cheaply using leftover rice, probably cooked by and for slaves. There's at least a basic filling comfort that it provided, but nutrition-wise, it's pretty pointless (pancakes are cheap, not good for you). As an interesting bread to serve with a gravy-based meal, I can see it coming into use--and maybe by tinkering with the recipe it could be gluten-free pretty easily, and maybe a little more uniformly bubbly and crisp, which would be better. My book's recipe is posted online here.
If you happen to know more about philpy, I'd love to hear it.