This entry is the result of an odd mix of events: I've been reading a sweet memoir about birding, the printed blog of Mimi Smartypants, a centuries-old Italian advice book called The Book of the Courtier and a lot of online stuff about Latin American culture. I also just spent four days sharing an apartment with two other hetero couples (they didn't overlap, so it was actually two days with each couple). The night before we left on our Seafair Avoidance Weekend, I had a houseful of geek boys, drinking beer and playing Dungeons and Dragons, which morphed into drinking beer and talking about The Future.
The result of all this has mainly been thinking about the boys I know, and trying to put them in some kind of historical context. Before the industrial revolution, men were pretty femmy; the upperclasses were fully expected to write poetry, sing insanely tragic romantic songs to their beloved, dress in bright colors, wear perfume and behave under tight societal restrictions when it came to basic manners and daily habits. Poor men, while expected to perform the lowerclass/manly stuff like gutting fish and trapping bunnies and ploughing land, were fussy about the wine they drank, hugged frequently, sang and danced with each other on all social occasions and put tremendous amounts of effort into beautifying public spaces. Then everything got all industrialized and personal value was tied to net income, which led to unpleasant sexism and a multigenerational trend for men to be really boring and repressed.
Now, the guys I know have become post-industrial. I can have conversations with them about fashion and literature that are awfully similar to the ones I have with girls. They care about style, and they hug and sing, and dear lord, might even write poetry although I hope the vast majority never share it with me. Most of them are reasonably happy with their jobs, but net income is by no means their primary method for determining happiness. Granted, most of them would sell out to the highest bidder in a heartbeat, but they're quite aware that selling out is exactly what they'd be doing and don't feel the need to gloss it over. Sweetie does seem to be the only one who genuinely knows his way around a tool box, but since I fix everything with just a hammer and a roll of duct tape, maybe in my own ignorance I underestimate the skills of the non-Sweeties.
I'm not talking about the word "metrosexual", because that word is basically the modern term for "dandy" or--even better--"macaroni" (yes, as in "stuck a feather in his cap and called it macaroni"). Metrosexual is, from what I've read, about fashion sense. Fancy shoes and styley shirts aside, I think what I see is more a result of this slow, painful shift to a post-industrial world. I think it's neat that the fellows I know are so vastly different from the men I read about as literary characters from the 20s to the 80s. They seem to have changed less on the way from boyhood to manhood than the two previous generations, without being immature jerks (even if I have seen one use pretend anti-girl-germ spray recently). Maybe the boring suit-n-tie-short-back-and-sides guy was really the result of Henry Ford's assembly line, and now that those lines are gone (at least in the US), that guy will fade away, too.
I kind of expect a lot of comments on this that include fart jokes and sugartits remarks. Maybe instead of that you should go buy a pair of shoes and sip a mocha frappacino. If you write a poem, keep it to yourself.